AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Webxprt browser benchmark9/1/2023 ![]() Article ContentsĪMD Ryzen 5 1500X - Overclocking to 4. As you can clearly see from the results below, we saw a 7 percent to 15 percent decrease in WebXPRT 3 performance with VBS on, and it didn’t matter what browser we usedalthough we saw less. We published our most recent comparison last April, when we used WebXPRT 4 to compare the performance of five browsers on the same system. WebXPRT shows performance went up 12.8% and we went up 7.3% in JetStream. Web JavaScript & HTML5 Benchmarks Results Summary: When it comes to online browsing we saw some great performance increases by overclocking the Ryzen 5 1500X CPU up to 4.2 GHz. It contains six HTML5- and JavaScript-based workloads: Photo Enhancement, Organize Album, Stock Option Pricing, Local Notes, Sales Graphs, and Explore DNA Sequencing. WebXPRT 2015 uses scenarios created to mirror the tasks you do every day to compare the performance of almost any Web-enabled device. It also includes a benchmark based on the Apache Harmony open source project’s HashMap and a port of the CDx benchmark, hand-translated to JavaScript. It also includes benchmarks from the LLVM compiler open source project, compiled to JavaScript using Emscripten 1.13. More details about the benchmark are available. JetStream includes benchmarks from the SunSpider 1.0.2 and Octane 2 JavaScript benchmark suites. MotionMark 1.2 Here are my MotionMark 1.2 results: Via : 'MotionMark is a graphics benchmark that measures a browser’s capability to animate complex scenes at a target frame rate. JetStream combines a variety of JavaScript benchmarks, covering a variety of advanced workloads and programming techniques, and reports a single score that balances them using geometric mean. Today, we wrap up our focus on WebXPRT’s anniversary by sharing some data about the benchmark’s truly. Try it now or check out posted results from a variety of devices. In our last blog post, we reflected on the 10-year anniversary of the WebXPRT launch by looking at the consistent growth in the number of WebXPRT runs over the last decade. The latest Octane 2.0 benchmark includes four new tests to measure new aspects of JavaScript performance, including garbage collection / compiler latency and asm.js-style JavaScript performance. WebXPRT is the gold standard of web benchmarks, is free to use, and runs right from your browser. Best web browser 2021: Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Opera go head-to-head We take a look at the performance and features of the big four internet browsers to see which one will serve you. Octanes goal is to measure the performance of JavaScript code found in large, real-world web applications, running on modern mobile and desktop browsers. Each example in TodoMVC implements the same todo application using DOM APIs in different ways. This benchmark simulates user actions for adding, completing, and removing to-do items using multiple examples in TodoMVC. Octane 2.0 is a benchmark created by Google that measures a JavaScript engines performance by running a suite of tests that is supposed to be representative of todays complex and demanding web applications. Speedometer tests a browsers Web app responsiveness by timing simulated user interactions. Results are reported in milliseconds (lower is better). Kraken uses a test harness based on the SunSpider benchmark. Kraken is a JavaScript performance benchmark created by Mozilla that measures the speed of several different test cases extracted from real-world applications and libraries. The benchmark is still available, though.Web JavaScript & HTML5 Benchmarks Mozilla Kraken 1.1: link Google developed this test, but the companyĪnnounced earlier this year that Octane is no longer being maintained and updated by its developers. WebXPRT: 185 (third) Analysis: Chrome’s gold medal performance on Basemark (just ahead of Edge), isn’t surprising, considering the number of web apps Google makes. ![]() Chrome does well to keep up with Safari 11. This is another benchmark by the WebKit Open Source Project. MotionMark is a graphics-based test, gauging animation performance. ![]() Safari is much fastest than Firefox in this test. Shorter bars/lower times are better. Click to enlarge. For this benchmark, a higher number is better. To read the white paper, go to facts.pt/ExploringWebXPRT2015. WebXPRT is an HTML5 and JavaScript test developed by benchmark maker Principled Technologies. This test is kind of like a PCMark for browsers, and to our mind, one of the. Among the benchmarks are versions built with React, Ember.js, AngularJS, vue.js, jQuery and othersframeworks that are used by the most popular sites in the world. WebKit-based browser, it’s probably not surprising how well Safari does in this benchmark. Finally, the paper shows how to automate the benchmark and how to submit test results. WebXPRT uses a wide number of web apps, from photo collections to online note-taking to data sets to score performance. JetStream is a JavaScript-based benchmark developed by the WebKit Open Source Project. Longer bars/higher scores are better. Click to enlarge. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |